The Warriors

Posted by will on February 17, 2011

The Warriors

QUICK HITS
Director: Walter Hill
Rating: R
Release: 1979
Language: English
Runtime: 93 minutes
Plot: A gang called The Warriors are framed for killing a gang leader trying to unite all the gangs in the area. With other gangs gunning for them they must get back to the home turf of Coney Island… Alive.

“Can…you…dig it?”

“The Warriors” opens with Cyrus (Roger Hill), the leader of the largest and most notorious gang in the city, the Gramercy Riffs, calling a conclave for nine unarmed representatives of all area gangs to convene in his home turf. When the good-for-nothing leader of a bunch of toughs aptly called the Rogues assassinates Cyrus, the Warriors are framed for the cold-blooded murder. Now, with every NYC gang hot on their trail and their leader, Cleon (Dorsey Wright), missing, the Warriors must navigate their way from the Bronx back to their home in Coney Island … alive.

For the most part, once you get over the initial premise and lead-up, the movie melts into a cat-and-mouse chase taking place in dreary NYC locales along the subway route home. The story is simple but it doesn’t need to be complicated, this movie has enough problems.

Boy howdy. Let’s start with our badass heros.

The acting was decent but I wanted a greater sense of urgency from the Warriors. The characters seemed way too flippant to be running for their lives for a crime they didn’t commit. Where was the the fear? The anger? The outrage? Perhaps they were too busy running for their lives to show a smidgen of reaction to their situation. And, I suspect, character development was not really the selling point of this movie.

That being said, it would have made the plodding story more interesting — we don’t exactly need anything deep, just something progressive. This was especially disappointing in the character Swan (Michael Beck), the second-in-command of the Warriors. This guy had potential to grow as the movie progressed but really never showed a spine and was completely wooden in how he dealt with various scenarios the Warriors faced. We’ll just chalk this up as an opportunity lost.

I would be remiss if I didn’t label this movie in the action genre yet compared to today’s level of bloodshed, all of the sequences are child’s play. The combat during the rumbles and clashes was definitely of the Friday-night-at-the-local-VFW-for-the-local-wrasslin’-promotion ilk. So, it struck me odd that a movie so seemingly tame could have been hailed, at the time, as something so controversial. I think it is a good benchmark to see, either for better or for worse, how far we have come, as a society, at portraying violence. Yet, there is something to applaud when it comes to predominately bloodless violence that doesn’t require the watcher to see, explicitly, the brutal process and aftermath.

The highlight of the movie were the wardrobes of each individual gang. The costuming direction was definitely kitschy but highly appropriate and pretty memorable. Our heroes were decked out in what appeared to be the offspring of Native American influences with motorcyclist sensibilities. Other featured players that made up the quilt of posse uniforms include the grease monkey Orphans, overall-over-rugby shirt Punks, kimono-ed Riffs, Marcel Marceau aficionado Hi-Hats, and probably the most infamous of all, the clown-faced, pinstripe pushing Baseball Furies. If you ask me, they could have seriously pushed the limits with some of these identities but it was fun to see all of the unique factions with their distinct looks.

Overall, there was a lot to like and appreciate in a movie with a simple story and few plot devices. The movie, in the end, really relied heavily on the visuals and action and if you can appreciate that, then you can appreciate this film. There is really not much doubt that the Warriors are going to make it home while in the process, clearing their names. Their long ride through the night is made a bit more appetizing when there are a lot of interesting things to look at along the way.

The Verdict:

★★★★★☆☆☆☆☆

4 Comments on this post | Published in Action, Adventure & Epic, Cult Classic

  • http://twitter.com/hero_inc Benjamin

    How did you come to see this movie?

  • Anonymous

    It’s a cult classic so I’m not sure how its infamy wormed its way into my personal recognition. I have definitely seen the Baseball Furies spoofed or Halloween costumed before.

    I wrote and re-wrote varying parts of this movie about 3 different times. I never really mentioned the context of the movie which is based on a book and was much more graphic and diverse. Pretty much, I thought the movie turned out to be lame.

    On the other hand, I kept thinking to myself the whole movie, “I’m surprised this has not been remade.” Well, apparently it’s in the works.

  • Abby

    I’m actually a massive fan of “The Warriors”–you’re right, there’s not a whole lot going on, but I think it’s a ton of fun. The dialogue is awesome, and endlessly quotable. I’m interested about this remake…who’s directing?

    Also, fun fact: Local Pittsburg, Kansas millionaire Gene Bicknell (he apparently owned the most Pizza Hut franchises in the world for a while), was a Baseball Fury. It’s almost enough to make me proud of my hometown.

    Also also: Did you watch the Director’s Cut? Because I hate the director’s cut of that movie. It’s full of bizzare retrofitted transitions that I found really distracting.

  • Anonymous

    Apparently Tony Scott (of “Top Gun”, “Beverly Hills Cop II”, “True Romance”, etc. fame) is taking the Warriors from NYC to LA and giving it a “real gang” feel. This already sounds like a hot mess.

    I liked the movie enough, I guess I had higher hopes. There is a lot to like about the film, for sure (the wardrobes, the music, the setting). I guess it was a love/hate thing.

    I did not watch the Director’s Cut but I was thinking that Adam West Batman-esque Zoks!, Bams! and Kapows! would have been appropriate during the fight scenes.